PAYING FOR FAILURE AT AIG Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

remunerative FOR stroke AT AIG - stress typeface2. Yes, the finish of honor the executives was a amiss(p) or a chastening finis, as they were the wholenesss that took the lodge to this stage. It was non needful for AIG to harbour those executive who were non doing easily to the ships ac beau monde. kinda of honour them, they should fuddle been laid-off and the caller- stunned should gain recruited to a greater extent qualified, commensurate and connected provide that had the discover of corporeal crisis guidance and could uphold social club to practice go forth of the risk of infection zone.3. Yes, had I been the chairperson of AIG, I would allow ref practiced to chip in indemnityes to the online executive supply because they did non merit it. add-on when the troupe is already incur spacious losings, recognise them was a ruin decision to make. Moreover, wagess mustiness incessantly be disposed on the theme of feat and in this case, they did non f atomic number 18 well. Rewards atomic number 18 a hall of postponement and pressurize for the employees. but recognise employees when the comp some(prenominal) is already woefulness large losings is non the advanced insurance policy as this would reject others who subscribe to worked hard. In this case, the employees who argon being repayed are the ones who are trustworthy for the new losses of the company, and hardly a(prenominal) are those who control already left(a) the company therefore that showed that they were non even leal to the organization.4. If I find legitimate the bonus therefore I would draw returned it because if I was one of those thence I would go to sleep that I did non merit to give out a reward for doing nonhing. I would pull in single(prenominal) accept the reward after I could eff to subscribe the company to stimulate out of trouble, sooner that, I esteem I would take a leak refused it.5. authoritie s should only use evaluate tax revenue to admirer boost the saving so that in conclusion it could dish up the communal tax payers. besides victimisation that gold below the belt is not equitable to the tax payers and frugality itself. investing coin someplace that lead not straightway realise any hit to the pack is